王立军给全世界的公开信 矛头指向薄熙来
2012年2月09日 （编者按：博讯收到转来的信件，寄送者自称是王立军海外的朋友，全文转发如下。）
我给全世界的公开信： 当大家看到这封信的时候，我或许已不在人世或许已失去了自由。我想向全世界解释一下我做这一切的原因。归根结底是一条： 我不希望看到党内最大的伪君子薄熙来能再继续表演下去，如果这样的奸臣当道，这将是中国未来最大的不幸和民族的灾难。
薄熙来"唱红打黑"的闹剧完全是为了他企图进入常委的做秀。这是薄熙来的"文化大革命"！ 他专制武断，心恨手辣，顺我者昌， 逆我者亡。他一直强迫包括我在内的下级用各种手段， 为他干各种不可想象的事。稍有不从，马上下狠手处置。他把所有人当成是口香糖，嚼完了随便一丢， 不管沾在谁的脚底。他才是最大的黑社会老大。 他已把整个重庆从党和人民的天下变成了他一人的家天下。按他的性格，当不上中国的老大是不会罢休的， 为达到这个目的他会不择手段。薄熙来号称清廉，但实际既贪又色，纵容家人大肆敛财，数额惊人。有关情况，我掌握了大量材料， 已向有关方面检举， 也委托了我国外朋友在适当时候在公布这封信后逐步公布于世！ 我也希望能够用这些材料有朝一日出书。
薄熙来无情无义到了极致， 从他文革中斗父亲，对待兄弟姐妹和对待前妻就可以看出。我为他两肋插刀，但他对我连条狗都不如，当我不愿再为他做脏事趟混水时， 竟然把我身边司机等抓走来威胁我。士可杀不可辱！我本不是什么英雄， 我愿意为人民流血流汗，但不再愿意再为叹息在这么一个坏人手下工作悄悄流泪！ 人终有一死， 我愿意用生命来揭露薄熙来，为中国的体制中少掉这么一个会祸害中华民族的野心家献出一切！
王立军
二零一二年二月三日
博讯首发 美联社：王立军在美国领事馆和美方人员 进行了会谈
博讯北京时间2012年2月09日 编译报道 
美联社的英文报道：China police chief may seek U.S. asylum
美联社报道称（要点大意），王立军的打黑可能因为没有按正常程序进行而失宠，他寻求政治庇护的消息无法核实。
王立军近期的职务调整引起关注，周三网上关于他到美领馆寻求政治庇护的消息引起轰动。在华盛顿，美国国务院发言人Victoria Nuland确认了博讯的独家报道，王立军找到美国领馆并和美方人员进行了会谈。Victoria Nuland称王立军自己离开了领馆，她对王立军是否寻求政治庇护拒绝评论。她说，据她所知，领事在会谈后再也没有和王立军取得联系。
美联社的报道对王立军和薄熙来的情况进行了阐述，称薄熙来在断绝和红歌、打黑幕后推手的联系，希望在政治仕途上继续提升。
[博讯编译报道]
美国国务院关于记者问答的原始信息：
QUESTION: -- specifically these reports coming out of China that a deputy mayor of Chongqing had sought refuge at the consulate in Chengdu and that there had been an unexpected increase in security personnel around the consulate for a while. What can you tell us about any of this?
MS. NULAND: Well, I think you’re referring to reports about the vice mayor of Chongqing – right – City. So his name is Wang Lijun. Wang Lijun did request a meeting at the U.S. Consulate General in Chengdu earlier this week in his capacity as vice mayor. The meeting was scheduled, our folks met with him, he did visit the consulate and he later left the consulate of his own volition. So – and obviously, we don’t talk about issues having to do with refugee status, asylum, et cetera.
QUESTION: Okay. But – so can you tell us exactly when that meeting took place?
MS. NULAND: I believe – we’re here on Wednesday – I believe it was Monday, but if that is not right, we will get back to you.
QUESTION: Do you have any information about what – have you had any subsequent contact with him? Because there’s some questions about his whereabouts.
MS. NULAND: Yeah. To my knowledge, we have not.
QUESTION: And aside from any possible thing that you couldn’t talk about on asylum can you tell us what he did talk about there? What was the purpose of this meeting?
MS. NULAND: Frankly, I don’t have anything at the moment on the substance of the meeting.
QUESTION: Can you say why you said he used – why you used the term, “he left the consulate of his – on his own volition”?
MS. NULAND: Well again, there has been some reporting to indicate that that might not have been the case, but it was the case.
QUESTION: Okay. The reporting being that he had been forced to leave or that had been dragged out, or --
MS. NULAND: There’s been unusual reporting about all of this. So just to reaffirm for you, that he walked out, it was his choice.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/02/183574.htm#CHINA(Modified on 2012/2/09) 博讯
|
